After years of working with growth and marketing teams, one constraint shows up again and again: not strategy, not talent, not budget — but whether teams can actually trust and act on their data.

AI is now exposing that constraint at scale.

The moments that matter most — launching a product, entering a new market, moving from AI experimentation to production — reveal what your systems can really support.

And that’s where most enterprises are getting stuck. They’re not struggling to build AI. They’re struggling to power it with their own data.

[CTA_MODULE]

We’re asking the wrong question about AI 

Over the past year, the conversation has centered on models — which ones to use, whether to build or buy, and how to deploy them. But after commissioning “The enterprise data infrastructure benchmark report 2026,” it’s clear the real constraint sits underneath all of that.

Nearly every enterprise we surveyed — 97% — reported delays in AI or analytics initiatives due to data pipeline issues. These aren’t isolated incidents. They’re systemic. And in many cases, delays are measured in weeks, not hours, costing businesses millions in maintenance and lost revenue potential.

That points to a very different constraint than most organizations expect. On paper, most organizations look ready. Modern data warehouses are in place. BI is mature. The tooling is there, but AI introduces a higher standard.

It depends on continuous, reliable data delivery across hundreds of sources and systems, more use cases, and far more complexity than traditional analytics ever required. And that’s where things start to break. 

At enterprise scale, data integration behaves like infrastructure — with real implications for cost, downtime, and performance. The benchmark findings make that clear:

• ~14% of data budgets are spent on integration (~$4.2M annually)
• 53% of engineering capacity goes to pipeline maintenance
• 60+ hours of downtime per month
• ~$3M in monthly business impact from that downtime 

What was once considered an operational inconvenience has become a structural risk. And yet, this isn’t a problem of underinvestment. 

Enterprises are already spending heavily on integration. The problem is where that investment goes. Much of it is still tied up in DIY and legacy approaches that weren’t designed for this level of scale or the demands of AI. As environments grow more complex — hundreds of pipelines, constant change, new AI workloads — those systems don’t stabilize. They get more fragile. 

The data reflects it: 

• 300+ pipelines in the average enterprise
• Nearly 60 engineers are required just to keep things running 
• Rising failure rates, longer recovery times, and incidents that can cost over $1M

Organizations with more reliable, automated data environments are nearly 2x more likely to exceed ROI expectations. Those that aren’t tell a consistent story: more failures, slower recovery, more time spent maintaining instead of building. AI performance doesn’t diverge at the model layer. It diverges at the foundation.

What high-performing enterprises do differently

The companies pulling ahead aren’t simply investing more. They’re operating differently. They treat data integration as infrastructure — standardized, automated, and designed to scale — not as a collection of custom-built pipelines held together over time.

That shift is what enables everything else: fewer failures, faster recovery, less manual work, and a foundation that can actually support AI in production. Because that’s the real transition happening right now. Enterprises aren’t asking whether to invest in AI anymore. They’re trying to move from experimentation to production. And that doesn’t happen on fragile systems. 

So the question isn’t which model to choose. It’s whether your systems can support it: 

• How often do your data pipelines break?
• How long does it take to recover?
• How much of your team’s time is spent maintaining vs. building?
• How much revenue potential are you losing as a result? 

Those answers will tell you far more about your AI readiness than any model evaluation. The organizations that get this right won’t just move faster. They’ll operate with a level of confidence and consistency that others can’t match.

[CTA_MODULE]